Alternative PE?
At our very last school board meeting of the year, a measure was introduced that would allow second year athletes to opt out of PE and use their sport to obtain the necessary credits for graduation. Sophomores ahtletes wouldn’t have to take PE in whatever trimester their sport falls into.
This is something that I’ve heard an overwhelming amount of support for from students. Ever since my freshman year, I’ve heard people complain about our rigid PE system and how PE is a waste of time and energy for athletes that already know the basics of fitness. As a varsity tennis player my sophomore year, I know firsthand how inconvenient it was to run every day during school when I would have three hour practices right after. And I had it easy- I’ve heard testimonies from water polo and swim team kids that swim before school, during athletics fifth period, and then during their actual practice time. These kids don’t need an extra 70 minutes of running, stretching, and bowling.
The scheduling aspect of the issue is also something that we discussed. When it comes down to it, this is the district deliberating whether or not to give students’ more of a choice in what they do at school. At present, our school requires PE for two years. This is supposed to be for the benefit of some ambiguous, faceless overweight statistic that the district hopes to help live a healthier life. The idea is that two years of PE make enough of a difference in his life to inspire him to live healthier and educate him in order to do it effectively. Obviously, PE rarely goes this way- but that’s an issue for another time. This deals with the students who already have the basic knowledge about fitness and healthy living that PE is supposed to teach. For these kids, an extra year of PE is time that could be spent training in their sport of taking academic classes. I know of at least one girl that couldn’t take a science class her sophomore year because of required PE- which is odd because she was an all-league water polo star that definitely wasn’t in need of any more physical activity.
And this isn’t some revolutionary thing; most other districts in the county have some kind of customizable PE program for athletes. In EBAL, I know that the majority of schools don’t even require two years. But changing things in any school district can be extremely difficult.
The primary opponents of this new measure worry about the childhood obesity and unhealthy lifestyles that this option would allegedly encourage. But if childhood obesity is the issue, wouldn’t specialized classes be the best way to reach students that are in danger of becoming obese? I mean, even the best PE teachers can only do so much to educate a single child with a personalized, effective approach. These days, they’ve got 40-50 other kids that need to be looked after. If athletes were allowed to stop wasting their time in these classes, then PE teachers would be better enabled to give at-risk students the attention and care they need.
In the end, the board decided that it was a complex issue that needed much more research and deliberation, as well as “direct communication with the people it would affect most… (at this point I was thinking, ‘students?’ Wait, nope.) PE teachers.” It’ll probably be a month or so before this measure is revisited. In the meantime I’m hoping to contact those students who feel strongly about getting this passed. They’re entirely capable of showing up to the meeting and raging for their allotted three minutes- I’ve heard such speeches many times before, usually after running Boot Hill or 20 snake runs up and down the football field.
I’ve heard so much complaining about this policy, and now that it’s being discussed, I’m really excited for it. Because if we can complain about this the right way, future athletes won’t need to complain about it any more.